Prosedur Pengambilan Keputusan Di Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0

Authors

  • Biqrotul Azizah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Imam Syafi’i Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/manova.v3i2.276

Keywords:

Decision Making Proces, Mechanism, Socialization, Higher Education

Abstract

 This article aims to describe the process of making and effective methods for the dissemination of decision results in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. This research uses library research taken from scientific journals and relevant literature. The results showed that the most effective decision making process was a combination of top-down and bottomup with formal decision-making mechanisms or decisions. Decision making formally involves leaders and subordinates and adjusted to the output of the meeting. The dominant dissemination mechanism is traditional dissemination through meetings and through social networks. The implications of the results of this study indicate that the formal process of decision making through public meetings or limited meetings is still the choice of the decision making process so that this traditional model provides space for all elements involved to participate and provide constructive advice for effective decision making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, Hasbi. (2015). Pengambilan Keputusan di Lembaga Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Hikmah. 4(1): 26-30.

Aziz, Muhammad, Amirullah Abduh Kajian Kebijakan Proses Pengambilan Keputusan di Perguruan Tinggi di Era Revolusi Industri. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan. 2(2): 30-35

Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Jordan, A., Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., Cairney, P., Davidson, D. (2015). Opening up the black box of adaptation decisionmaking. Nature Climate Change. 5(6), 493.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2): 77-79.

Fathin, Fariza. (2016). Pengambilan Keputusan pada Remaja yang Mengalami Kehamilan di Luar Nikah (Studi di Kabupaten Mojokerto Jawa Timur). repository.unair.ac.id (repository.unair.ac.id/68251/2/Fis.S.59.17%20.%20Fat.p%20- %20JURNAL.pdf diakses pada 5 Juni 2020).

Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top?down and bottom?up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31(2?3): 187-190.

Kim, Y. H., Sting, F. J., & Loch, C. H. (2014). Top-down, bottom-up, or both? Toward an integrative perspective on operations strategy formation. Journal of Operations Management. 32(7): 462-465.

Marchisotti, G. G., & Almeida, R. L. De. (2018). Decision-making at the Firt Managment Level: The Interference of the Organizational Culture. Revista de Administração Mackenzie. 20(3): 1-3.

Syafi’i, Imam. (2017). Kepemimpinan Kiai Abdul Ghofur dalam pengembangan pendidikan entrepreneurship di Pondok Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan. digilib.uinsby.ac.id (digilib.uinsby.ac.id/19893/5/Bab%202.pdf diakses pada 5 Juni 2020).

Turpin, S. M., & Marais, M. (2004). Decisionmaking: Theory and practice. OriON. 20(2): 143. Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008). Machine morality: bottom-up and topdown approaches for modelling human moral faculties. Ai & Society. 22(4): 565.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-20

How to Cite

Azizah, B., & Syafi’i, I. (2020). Prosedur Pengambilan Keputusan Di Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Inovasi (MANOVA), 3(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.15642/manova.v3i2.276

Issue

Section

Articles