Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa dengan Dua Faktor Moderasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29080/jai.v8i2.833Keywords:
Diamond Fraud, Academic Fraud Behavior, GenderAbstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the factors that influence student fraud at the academic level in the Accounting Study Program, where in the main scope of education students are expected to become anti-fraud generations, so it needs to be instilled since they were in college, considering that based on previous research not a few students who have committed acts of academic fraud. Factors of academic fraud behavior include pressure, opportunity, rationalization and capability called fraud diamond which needs to be explored more deeply to test the effectiveness of the fraud concept, as well as two moderating factors, namely gender and religiosity. This research is a type of quantitative research and literacy studies. The results of the study can be concluded that the opportunity and capability factors have a significant influence while the factors of pressure, rationalization, gender and religiosity have an insignificant effect on student academic fraud behavior.
Downloads
References
Andayani, Yozi, and Vita Fitria Sari. 2019. “Pengaruh Daya Saing, Gender, Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa S1 Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Padang).” Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi 1 (3): 1458–71.
Annisa, Fatimah, Eki Andhika Ratnawardani, and Magdalena Marlena. 2019. “Academic Fraud Mahasiswa Polinema: Sebuah Analisis Fraud Diamond Dan Religiusitas.” Seminar Nasional Gabungan Bisnis & Sosial Polinema 2019, no. 2015: 94–106. https://prosiding.polinema.ac.id/sngbs/index.php/snamk/article/viewFile/233/193.
Artani, Ketut Tri Budi, and I Wayan Wetra. 2017. “Pengaruh Academic Self Efficacy Dan Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi Di Bali.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi 7 (2): 123–32. http://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JUARA/article.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia Chapter. 2019. “Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019.” Acfe Indonesia, 72.
Chin, W. 1998. “.” Squares, The Partial Least Equation, Approach for Structural Modeling», In Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed) Research, Modern Method for Business Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum Associates, Hal. 295-358. 1998.
Ghozali. 2006. “Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif Dengan PLS.”
Hidayah, Nila. 2018. “Analisis Etika Kerja Islam Dan Etika Penggunaan Komputer Terhadap Ketidaketisan Penggunaan Komputer Oleh Pengguna Teknologi Informasi Di UMKM Kabupaten Bantul.” JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia) 8 (1): 59. https://doi.org/10.21927/jesi.2018.8(1).59-73.
Kushartanti, Anugrahening. 2009. “Perilaku Menyontek Ditinjau Dari Kepercayaan Diri.” Indigenious, Jurnal Ilmiah Berkala Psikologi.
Murdiansyah, Isnan, Made Sudarman, and Nurkholis. 2017. “Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik.” Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual.
Nursani, Rahmalia, and Gugus Irianto. 2016. “Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa : Dimensi Fraud Diamond.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB.
Padmayanti, Kadek Desi, Edy Sujana, and Putu Sukma Kurniawan. 2017. “Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi
Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa ( Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Penerima Bidikmisi Jurusan Akuntansi S1 Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha ).” E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 8 (2): 1–12.
Purnamasari, Desi. 2013a. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa.” Educational Psychology Journal. 2013b. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa.” Educational Psychology Journal 2 (1): 13–21. file:///D:/My Documents/Downloads/2581-Article Text-5082-1-10-20131203.pdf.
Purnamasari, Dian, and Gugus Irianto. 2013. “Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Saat Ujian Dan Metode Pencegahannya.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya 2 (2): 1–25.
Purwanto, Edy, JMV. Mulyadi, and Choirul Anwar. 2017. “Kajian Konsep Diamond Fraud Theory Dalam Menunjang Efektivitas Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintah Kota Bogor.” Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia 17 (3): 149. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v17i3.1153.
R. Aziz, N. Novianti. 2016. “Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond, Integritas, Dan Religiusitas Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Konsentrasi Syariah Universitas Brawijaya).”Resnayati, Y. 2014. Buku Ajar Pendidikan Dan Budaya Antikorupsi (PBAK).
Siddiq, Faiz Rahman, and Sofyan Hadinata. 2016. “Fraud Diamond Dalam Financial Statement Fraud Fraud Diamond Dalam Financial Statement Fraud.” BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen Islam 4 (2): 98. https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v4i2.2692.
Sugiyono. 2017. “Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, Dan R&D.” 2017.
Tempo. 2013. “Skandal Contek Massal Tampar Universitas Harvard.” 2013. https://dunia.tempo.co/read/458600/skandal-contek-massal-tampar-universitas-harvard/full&view=ok%0A.
Widiana. 2013. “Hubungan Antara Kadar Religiusitas Dengan Kesehatan Mental.”
Wolfe, David T, and Dana R Hermanson. 2004. “The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud.” CPA Journal. https://doi.org/DOI:
Zamzam, Irfan, Suriana Mahdi, and Resmiyati Ansar. 2017. “Pengaruh Diamond Fraud Dan Tingkat Religiusitas Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Pada Mahasiswa S-1 Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi Se Kota Ternate).” Akuntansi Peradaban 3: 1–24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nila Hidayah, M. Nur Sholiqin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
